Kate ([info]digital_eraser) wrote,
@ 2007-08-16 11:28:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Madtown, WI
Current music:Presidents Of The United States Of America - "Candy" [Live]
Entry tags:comics

What You Didn't Read In The Chicago Panel Reports
While in Chicago, I was highly curious what the online reactions would be to the Joe Q / MJ craziness that I witnessed in a few key panels, so one of the first things I checked when I got back were the Newsarama and Comic Book Resources panel reports. And I was highly surprised to discover that not only was there seemingly no internet fan reaction...but that both sites had either not reported tidbits that I found significant, or simply understated the whole thing.

For example, one thing you may have missed is that, at the Marvel X-Men Panel, we ended up discussing MJ for a around 25 minutes (or possibly more) of the 60 minute panel! It came up when Joe was asked if he'd yet addressed the three "genies" he'd like to put "back in bottle" he'd once mentioned in interviews, and if he could tell us what those three were. The third one he brought up was the Spidey marriage thing...and from there, he was debating with the audience for approximately half of the X-Men panel.

Newsarama at least mentions in their report that we were on the topic for 25 minutes or so, and Comic Book Resources comments on it in their report's title. But one thing that neither site mentions, is that the moment it came up, with Joe Q naming it as his third genie-in-the-bottle, the sound of low "boo"s filled the audience! And ended up being "boo"ed two more times before the whole discussion was over! At a panel that was filled more with *X-Men* fans than Spidey fans!

I didn't hear any "boo"ing from the crowd at the Mondo Marvel panel, but the MJ marriage once again dominated the Q&A portion of the panel, though you wouldn't guess from the three-sentence summary it gets in Newsarama's report. The CBR report actually mentions a few of the specific questions/answers addressed, but misses what I thought was the money-quote of the hour, which at least Newsarama paraphrases in their aforementioned three-sentence summary. When asked why we need Spidey unmarried in the regular books, when you can read new young-unmarried-Spidey stories in Ultimate Spider-Man, Joe responded that there are all sorts of things you can do with regular Spidey that you can't do with younger, Ultimate Spidey, because younger Spidey can't do things like "have sex, or download porn."

Yes, have sex, and download porn. That is an exact quote...I am not making that up. My roomie [info]crazy_elf_girl turns to me in disbelief and whispers "those are the stories he wants to tell...??"

After he's finished answering the next question (a non-MJ one), I decide to raise my hand, hoping to get him to elaborate on the sex/porn thing. Joe points right at me, but there were two guys in front of me and slightly to the sides, and one of them launches into his question, thinking Joe was point at him...oh well. After that question has finished up, I raise my hand, and Joe calls on me again. My question goes like this:

"One of the things I really like about the way the Spider-man books is set up, is that with Ultimate Spider-man you can read about younger, single Spider-man, and in Amazing Spider-man you can read about the older, mature, married Spider-man, which allows you to be able to tell a greater variety of different stories. So I'm confused, are there really stories you want to do with an older unmarried Spidey, that couldn't be done with Ultimate Spidey-- [Joe tries to start his answer, but I briefly cut him off to finish the rest of my question] --because I don't think "having sex" and "downloading porn" make for real interesting..."


And then I trail off to let Joe start his answer. Which is basically once again asserting that, yes, there are all sorts of stories you can only tell with an older unmarried Spidey, but without being able to cite any more convincing examples.

I was so disappointed to discover my question wasn't covered in either panel report... ;-P

Oh well...I suppose it's reported now. ;-)

One other thing, that [info]crazy_elf_girl noticed more than I did, was how visibly annoyed Joe seemed to be getting, as question after question ended up being about MJ. It got to the point where, when about ten minutes were left of the panel, they finally asked if there were any non-MJ questions.

I've sometimes wondered if it's just those of us who are more feminist-minded comic fans who are most opposed to Joe's ridiculous idea that Spidey's marriage makes it more difficult to come up with stories. But after seeing just how opposed the majority of fans in general are to the idea, I think it's safe to say that this is the most unpopular story idea since "Spider-man is actually a clone!"

During the X-Men panel, at one point someone shouted out "Mary Jane is a skrull!," which was my first thought when the news of Bendis's "skrull invasion" idea first hit after New Avengers #31. Joe gave a short answer under this breath, that I can't remember exactly, other than that it sounded like a "shoot, someone guessed it, must come up with redirection!" type answer. But that could be just because I already suspect he's been seriously thinking about it... ;-P



(Post a new comment)


[info]dryponder
2007-08-16 05:49 pm UTC (link)
wish i could've been there for the booing. heh.

(Reply to this)


[info]heykidzcomix
2007-08-16 07:18 pm UTC (link)
Oh come now, I think we'd all love to see Web of Spiderman (Downloading Porn) go from a mini to an ongoing. If Joe has to have MJ raped and set on fire for that to happen, so be it!

(Reply to this)


[info]papajoemambo
2007-08-16 07:21 pm UTC (link)

People love their MJ, unless they work for Marvel editorial.

You have plenty of Chicago Con stories you have to tell me sometime in chat, Young Lady.


(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-16 07:24 pm UTC (link)
You have to sign onto chat first, dude. ;-P

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]papajoemambo
2007-08-16 07:25 pm UTC (link)


Oh yeah - there is *that*....



(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]david_wisdom
2007-08-16 07:48 pm UTC (link)
"have sex and download porn"

Man what?

Thanks for pressing him on what stories need an older, unmarried Spider-Man. I'm still wondering when Quesada's gonna give a straight answer on that one.

(here from WFA)

(Reply to this)


[info]wiccabuffy
2007-08-16 08:03 pm UTC (link)
Ugh. I was SO PISSED OFF when I found out how he was finally getting his way with MJ in the Spidey books and she'd be gone, but I didn't know it was this bad.

Do you mind if I re-print some of your stuff you've written about it in my LJ so my other comic-fans can read it?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-16 08:39 pm UTC (link)
No problem. ^_^

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lost_angelwings
2007-08-16 10:02 pm UTC (link)
XD

Doesn't Joe expect ppl to ask questions like this? Shouldn't he have a better response prepared or are these honestly the stories he DOES want to tell?

(Reply to this)


[info]philippos42
2007-08-16 10:40 pm UTC (link)
MJ a Skrull?

But... they already did that with Alicia in FF!

I don't think they should go to that well again. Really.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-16 10:47 pm UTC (link)
I do not disagree. ;-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dejadrew
2007-08-17 04:11 am UTC (link)
...Teenagers don't have sex or download porn?

What high school did HE go to?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]stephanite
2007-08-18 01:07 am UTC (link)
There probably was no internet when JoeyQ was in school.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]looking2dastars
2007-08-17 06:20 am UTC (link)
Okay. I haven't been reading any Marvel books outside of Daredevil and Fantastic Four. So I've missed a lot of this Skrull nonsense.

But I have to ask, based on your comments here... is it just me, or does it seem like Marvel is ripping off the DC Comics Millennium story-line?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-17 12:52 pm UTC (link)
I don't read a lot of DC, so I have no idea, heh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sailormur
2007-08-17 02:43 pm UTC (link)
Huh. I'm married, and I have sex and download porn...

Anyway. What were the other two genies? I read ASM but don't follow a lot of fan discussions to find what the uproars are.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-17 03:32 pm UTC (link)
The first genie had to do with the X-Men having become too big and not feeling as special anymore, which I agree with. He feels he's fixed this via the "No More Mutants" thing, where there is a much smaller number of mutants, making them even more of a minority again. Which in actuality has even further broken the X-books, for reasons Paul O'Brien better expresses here.

What to me has made the X-books less special isn't the number of mutants in the Marvel U, but the number of damn X-books watering down the whole line. I thought it absurd that the moment M-Day brought down the number of mutants, they simultaneously launched even more X-books. Bleh.


The second genie had something to do with all the superheroes being too familiar with each other nowadays, everyone knowing one another...he preferred it in the earlier Stan and Jack days when it wasn't like a huge extended family. Or something like that...I didn't really get what his problem was. But he said he feels he's at least partially shaken this up with Civil War, where the superheroes are now a little more at-odds with each other and such. *shrugs*

Another fairly notable tidbit that it seems none of the comics news places reported on.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dernjg
2007-08-17 08:55 pm UTC (link)
I'm also in the married category. Frankly, I'm getting a little tired with TPTB saying that Peter being married is boring and limits the stories they can tell with him. Honestly, he was single for so long that there were plenty of stories for Ultimate Spidey to retread.
Meanwhile, he now has to keep a marriage together, remember anniversarys, get pressure from relatives to start getting kids, deal with paparazzi betting on his celeb marriage failing, fight for privacy, and even take on the occassional supervillain. Yeah, there's no real story potential there (Options 1, 2, 3 and 4 are also stories that ONLY work if he's married).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-17 09:14 pm UTC (link)
Yes, exactly...4 and 5 in particular sound like interesting drama territory as yet left unexplored.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ravenveil
2007-08-18 12:07 am UTC (link)
Personally I'm tired of the "omg I'm a superhero trying to date" story lines. Reading about couples trying to decide if they should have kids when they might end up with mutations/superpowers or be used as a hostage would be more interesting.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]karenhealey
2007-08-18 02:38 am UTC (link)
Also, I'm just saying, how is it totally impossible for a married man to have sex or download porn? I'm sure it's a really rare occurance and everything, but surely they could find some way to manipulate such atypical adult married male activities into Peter's life.

(Reply to this)


[info]phoenixab
2007-08-18 06:20 pm UTC (link)
It's understandable Joe getting flustered when half of an X-men's panel's questions are just complaining about something happening in Spider-man.

I'd rather the two stay together, but I'm going to wait for the story to come out before I get too bent out of shape about it.

(Reply to this)


[info]geordiesteve
2007-08-20 09:26 am UTC (link)
I think your question was right on the nose. The only reason I can see for them to make him single again is to keep his age vague and hope that somehow it makes more appealing to kids, as a married man might seem too much like their parents than a hero they aspire to. Some serious irony there I'm sure. However if they think fixing that one thing, plus seeing Spidey out chasing female superhero tail will bring in the kids, that is a little naive. The endless complex continuity makes it hard to be a gateway book. They have been telling single Spider-man stories for how many years vs. married Spider-man?

If I was EIC, after the first film was a raging success, I would have tried launching a new Spidey title based on film continuity, not just a film tie in, a regular montly book. Print it on cheap paper, with a good creative team, make it kid-friendly so it can be sold at more outlets, retail stores, newspaper shops etc, and bring out trades regularly too, to hook any fans from the films and hopefully keep them coming back. No continuity problems, no married Spider-man, it could be a cheap gateway book to get them into other stuff.

Next year, we have a new Hulk film, and a new Iron man film. Other than film tie-ins, does anyone think they would try the above? No, me neither.

Steve

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-20 11:42 am UTC (link)
The problem with trying to base a regular series on film continuity, is that things you bring in or do could conflict with what happens in an eventual sequel.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]geordiesteve
2007-08-20 03:23 pm UTC (link)
That's a possibility, but surely despite their differences, they're all on the same side. Couldn't they all talk to each other behind closed doors to avoid such problems?

I'm just very conscious of the box office at the moment and how it is being dominated by comic book films, or what people term 'kids book' like Potter. There are other films doing great numbers, but no one can deny that comics-related films are big business. Having tie-in books is all good and well, like the Nightcrawler prequel to X3, but it seems very naive to just hope people will then go from there to a comic shop.

Anyway, well done on asking that question and making him squirm a little bit longer. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-20 08:26 pm UTC (link)
"Couldn't they all talk to each other behind closed doors to avoid such problems?"

You'd think, in theory. But my understanding is that the movie people don't have the time to be concerning their attention with the printed books, and the comic side very much dislikes the idea of these other people coming in to tell them what to do anyways. The latter being the whole reason for that Wolverine Origins mini-series, in fact...wanting to tell his "real" origin before the movies could try to do it for them (I recall Joe Q and people stating that outright in interviews).

But yeah, every movie tie-in one shot or adaption I've seen Marvel do it seems has pretty universally sucked anyways.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]skalja
2007-08-21 09:31 pm UTC (link)
... Wait, wasn't he arguing before that Spidey needs to be unmarried so that he's relatable for the children?! What? Ew!

Hi, major Spidey/MJ fan, here from WFA. May I link to this on girl-wonder.org, by any chance?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digital_eraser
2007-08-21 09:32 pm UTC (link)
I don't mind at all. :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]skalja
2007-08-21 11:10 pm UTC (link)
Posted, with my thanks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dorothywwom
2007-12-30 02:24 am UTC (link)
Marvel's ruined.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…